The Future of Information: Fark

Information is more readily accessible today than ever before.  Google can answer most questions in under a tenth of a second.  Wikipedia has indexed over 10 million topics, exponentially more than a traditional encyclopedia or dictionary.  News stories break in real time.

With all of these advancements in the volume and availability of information, why has there been relatively little improvement in the knowledge level (for lack of a better term) of the general public over the same period of time?  It’s actually pretty simple – while useful, factual information is abundant so too is information that is irrelevant, incorrect, or of poor quality.

Consider the following analogy.  You and I are sitting in a room, I whisper something to you but you can’t hear me.  So I speak louder but as I speak I also turn up the volume of the radio sitting between us.  The result is you still can’t hear what I’m saying very well.  This is what has happened thus far in the so called “information age” – data is louder (more accessible) but just as difficult to hear (find).

What does this mean?  First, search is in its infancy.  Currently search engines pull from multiple data points to find the most relevant information of the highest quality.  Increasing the number of data points will naturally work to refine the search.  That’s what Facebook, Microsoft and Google are all working on now by building social applications on top of their search technology.  In the very near future you’ll be able to view search results that are not only relevant to your query but also to the group of contacts you have in your email, IM, social network, or any other online community.  For example, I could conduct a search for a work related topic and the search engine would return results co-workers (pulled from my Outlook account) or professional contacts (pulled from LinkedIn) had found useful for the same topic, ranked by amount of time spent on the sites and number of repeat visits.  Pretty cool, right?

But that’s only part of the solution.  We’re still talking in mathematical, formulaic terms.  What about a personal touch?  Regardless of the level of sophistication in search algorithims there will always (although I hesitate to speak in such absolute terms) be a demand/need for some kind of human oversight.

Call it an editor, call it an internet guru, but for everything I do online (blog, buy goods/services, look for news and information, conduct traditional keyword searches, etc) I want someone or some thing to recommend completely random things that I care about but few have found/are aware of.  This is the premise behind services like Reddit, Digg, and Stumbleupon but all fall short in that they rely on a voting system so something has to become popular before I learn about it.

Another site called Fark does things a bit differently by employing real humans to select a small number of user submitted links that they find interesting or funny.  As a result, Fark does a much better job at consistently posting links its readers enjoy because there’s human oversight and thus no way to game the system.  I want Fark for the entire internet – search, e-commerce, entertainment… everything.

Not possible/scalable?  No, today it is not but tomorrow it just may be 🙂

Update: We have a nice little discussion going in the comments section.  Mr. David O. brought up some good points and I was able to explain my position a bit more succinctly .


4 Responses to The Future of Information: Fark

  1. David Ochoa says:

    Joe I tend to believe that the knowledge level of the general public has not improved due to the fact that as the overall efficiency and ease of living has gone up, the quest for knowledge has inversely gone down.

    The ambitious mind breeds innovation through the basic need of understanding as well as the quest to improve the daily lives of one another.

    If a large portion of the public is content with their lives then naturally there will be less desire to know the unknown.

  2. David Ochoa says:

    Or to be analogous with it as well, it doesn’t matter if I bring the horse to a pond or the ocean if he doesn’t want to drink in the first place..

  3. Joe Cure says:

    Well I think the horse would sooner imbibe fresh water from a pond… 🙂 Analogy aside you certainly could be right but I disagree.

    I am of the opinion that people are more generally informed today than ever before. I know more about the world and my surroundings than my parents did at my age and I think that’s true for most young people today. However, this increase in knowledge is nowhere near proportional to the increases in technology we’ve observed over the past 20 years.

    The question then becomes why has this heightened awareness not kept pace with technological advances (if technology is in fact the primary reason for our new levels of awareness/knowledge which I believe it is) and my answer is this has happened because despite recent advances, our technology still very primitive relative to what it would have to be in order to see a drastic increase in the knowledge level of the human population.

    For example, after doubling the volume of an inaudible noise I still may not be able to hear the noise (i.e. 100% increase in capacity but resulting in no noticeable change from my perspective). However, once the noise becomes audible, doubling the volume makes a remarkable difference.

    To me, the internet as we know it hasn’t even advanced to a stage where it could be considered audible. I hate to use the phrase “Tipping Point” but that’s precisely it: we haven’t reached the tipping point for the internet/search/information systems to significantly impact our daily lives which I think is incredibly exciting

  4. David Ochoa says:

    I knew you were going to get me on the salt water..

    I think the “tipping point” will come when the effort it takes to access such information from the internet is negligible. If I wanted to find out about the speed in which an atom will split I could, but to me even the effort to search for it using an already existing engine is simply not worth it. However if I booted up my computer and there was a link loaded up into a type of “you may find this interesting” menu I would be more apt to find out about it.

    plenty of websites do this to a certain extend with products but none that I know of do this with information.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: